Joint Digital

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Page Blog
Blog

To Discuss or Not to Discuss...Let's Discuss!

E-mail Print PDF

One of the first things that I try to impress upon anyone that comes to see me for help in developing an online course is that they MUST use the discussion board.  It is as simple as black and white.  I can always tell the instructors that use the discussion board component to placate me versus those that use it as a serious learning tool.  Those that use it because I said they should use it are always in my office the following semester complaining about how useless the discussion board tool is.

In a way, I’m glad that they are struggling.  They get to see first-hand exactly what I’m talking about.  Without the use of discussion in an online course, there is no community.  When there is no community, the ability for students and the instructor to learn from each other disappears.  Remember that old adage about it taking a village to raise a child?  The same holds true for distance learning.

When these instructors visit me prior to the next semester, the first thing I do is ask them what kinds of topics were they posting for their students to respond to.  When we open their discussion boards, I notice that many of their discussions can be easily answered in just a few short sentences; if not a simple yes or no!  In my mind, this isn’t a discussion.  When my wife and I are in a debate over what to eat for dinner, we often converse in paragraphs of point, counterpoint.  Debate over course topics should generate as much discussion- if not more than a discussion over burgers or tacos.

The discussion board assignment is an opportunity for the instructor to move up Bloom’s taxonomy and allow students to begin to synthesize course content.  Instructors that miss the face-to-face environment because they can’t see physical evidence of student’s understanding should welcome the discussion board with open arms.  It is this higher level thinking that will help the instructor truly understand whether their student’s “get it” or not; without ever looking at a single face in class.

There are 5 critical pieces to setting up a proper discussion board.  First, the instructor needs to decide how involved they want to be in the discussion.  My suggestion is that instructors may want to be more involved in the first few semesters of developing a new course.  This way, the topics themselves can be judged and/or modified if necessary.  Once they are comfortable with the questions and how they are worded, their visits can be trimmed back.  That’s not to say that instructors shouldn’t visit the discussion board at least twice a day when any discussion topic is active.  It is also not enough to just visit the discussion.  Make some comments to let students know that their work isn’t going unnoticed.

Secondly, for ease of grading, the instructor will want to recommend materials that students read or review prior to submitting their responses to the discussion board.  I recommend this so that instructors can spend their time grading the responses and not combing the Internet looking for resources that may or may not be cited by the student, and may or may not be considered legitimate.  This is also how an instructor can further control discussion so that it is congruent with the course learning objectives.

Next, instructors should think about the questions they want their students to respond to.  Notice I said questions, as in plural.  The thing to remember is that in an online course, the discussion board is taking the place of the discussion that students would be having in a face-to-face class.  I’m going to go out on a limb and say that in the traditional classroom, instructors ask more than one question during a class period.  When formulating these questions, create some that have definitive answers, and others that could be left open to the student’s own interpretation of the concepts.  Student’s interpretations will elicit responses from their peers and give instructors the best indicator of their knowledge application and retention.

Finally, instructors should decide how each response is going to be graded.  Once they have figured this out, they should make it public.  Create a rubric that is shared with students at orientation.  Make it part of the syllabus, and also have it posted somewhere that makes sense in online course materials.

I know, I said there were five pieces.  The fifth piece is conditional.  It is based on whether or not the instructor is teaching online or in a blended format.  If teaching online, then the four pieces already outlined are all that is needed.  If the course is blended, there is one final piece to think about.

Blended courses meet both in the classroom as well as online.  The instructor needs to think about how the work done online sets up the next face-to-face session, or vise-versa.  Make sure that traditional classroom time is spent discussing the work being completed online.  When I say this I don’t mean providing dry reminders that X is due in the discussion board by this date.  Use student’s written materials to inject involvement and interest in the topical conversations held in the traditional classroom.  Make the student’s work worth more than just the grade they get at the end of the semester.

There are lots of considerations to be made when developing an online course.  One that shouldn’t take too much pondering is the choice to use a discussion board.  It is the best way an instructor can control communication about course topics while getting a good idea how each student is interpreting and applying course information.  A little thought and careful planning will give instructors the results they are looking for while achieving the highest goal of all--helping the learner.

Please stay subscribed for more features on both asynchronous and synchronous practices in education and how they directly affect the learner.



Last Updated on Tuesday, 01 June 2010 07:45
 

Asynchronous Collaboration

E-mail Print PDF

I'm just finishing up teaching my second graduate course this semester.  I love teaching for multiple reasons.  The biggest reason is that I'm exposed to so many other ideas and questions from my participants.  We spend a lot of time talking about group work.  To me, group work is a quintessential component of an effective online course.  Many of the course management systems (CMS) facilitate this type of learning.  Based on my own opinion, and the opinions of many of my participants, these CMSs don't go far enough.

I thought I would do a little self directed research to try and locate some collaboration options that could be used for free and were outside the grips of any course management system.  I found a really good resource.  For this article, I'm going to focus on another Web 2.0 application called crocodoc.

Crocodoc allows a user to load and markup HTML, Word, PowerPoint, PDF, PNG, and JPEG file formats.  You don't even need to have an account with crocodoc to use their services.  Simply load one, or many of the supported files previously mentioned to the Web site, and you are ready to go.  Crocodoc will create a Web page for each document that you upload.  If you don't sign up for an account, it is up to you to keep track of the unique URLS where each document is located.  As the site points out, this can simply be done by bookmarking each URL.

Signing up for a free account will give you the ability to have a profile page of your own.  This page will keep track of each document that you have uploaded to the site.  You are able to manage each of your documents at a very high level from this page as well.  You have the option of deleting the file, or changing the name of the file.  The profile page will also tell you when the file(s) were added and when they were last edited.  Finally, this page allows you to upload more documents for review.

Once a document has been loaded into crocodoc, it is easily shared with any number of reviews.  You have the ability to share the location of this document via an email, or via a link that can be copied and pasted into an email, CMS, or any other Web based application that will allow you to post a link.

The review interface is simple, clean, and very intuitive.  This is a very lightweight tool with some heavy-hitting benefits for zero cost!  As a reviewer, you have access to post-it-note, highlight, drawing, text, and strikeout tools.  As you use each of these tools, a receipt is generated on the right-hand side of the screen.  If you can remember to enter your name at the top of this receipt area, each change that you propose will be attributed to your name.  Every one in the review group will see who proposed what.

When the review process is finished, a .PDF file that contains all the proposed changes can be downloaded from the site.  You are also able to download the original file that was posted in its original format.  You will always be able to see where you started and where you currently stand with a document in a review process.

The only thing missing from this application is the ability to accept changes and have them automatically applied.  Someone still needs to be responsible for manually making all the proposed edits.

There is also a premium account that does cost money, but it allows you to upload larger files as well as high-end password protection for your documents.  This application is not complete, but it is a wonderful tool to help facilitate collaboration in any virtual learning environment.

 

Last Updated on Saturday, 27 March 2010 11:02
 

Creating Tests in Blackboard

E-mail Print PDF

There isn't a week that goes by that I'm not asked if there is any easier way to create exams and quizzes in Blackboard.  The simple and short answer is yes.  I'm well aware of the many publishers that exist that offer all kinds of content cartridges that can very easily be loaded into a blackboard course.  This solution is definitely easy.  It's fast too.  However, there are still many faculty that are more comfortable creating their own exams.  Whatever their reasons might be, there are ways to speed up the process.  As with most of the articles and tutorials on this site, this solution is free and available as a Web-based application.

The typical process for creating an exam manually in Blackboard requires that the instructor enter the text for each question and then do likewise for all possible answer choices.  Once all the text for a question and its accompanying answers are entered, the correct answer must be indicated by clicking on the corresponding radio button.  It may not sound like a ton of work, but it is very time consuming.  Many of the instructors I meet with think they have improved this system by authoring their exams in Microsoft Word, then move the exam to Blackboard by copying and pasting each question and potential answer.  This does speed up the exam creation time, but the amount of time I then spend with instructors fixing all the formatting issues that arise from copying and pasting all that extra Microsoft XML code eats up any time gained by this process in the first place.  If this is the route you prefer to take, I won't try to stop you.  However, if you are going to set up your exams this way, try doing a save as and save the file as a .txt file.  This will scrub the XML formatting from your text and your copy and paste operation will move much more smoothly--especially when you are concerned about how your text looks when presented in Blackboard.

The alternative I suggest comes in the form of a Web site hosted by the College of Southern Idaho.  The address for this site is: http://www.csi.edu/blackboard/bbquiz/ This Web site hosts a script that will take specifically formatted text and create a .zip file that is ready to be imported to Blackboard's Pool Manger.  All you need to do is import the file, set up the instance of the exam in the test manager, and then deploy the exam in the appropriate location in your course.

If you do a Google search, you can find any number of similar exam generator solutions on the Web.  I like this one for several reasons.  First, it allows faculty to use a word processor to create their exams.  This way, they have a "soft" copy of the exam that they can use as a backup, or they could print the exam (with a few modifications) and have a hard copy of the exam to give in a face-to-face environment.  If you don't care about backup copies of your exam, the Web site allows the user to work directly in the application to enter text and format the questions prior to creating the .zip file.  Next, I like how incredibly simple it is to use.  As long as your questions are formatted properly, and your correct answers are marked, the whole process from script to deployment takes very little time.  There is a "Documentation" link that shows the user how to create each type of question that the script is capable of creating.  The documentation also gives an example of each question, so if the instructions aren't clear, the user can view the example and be on their way.  Finally, the script is free!  As humans, we have found ways to make money off of so many things in life that are good.  I have to say thanks to the College of Southern Idaho for maintaining and allowing all who come to their site to make use of such a time saving tool!

Please look in the tutorials section of this Web site for a video tutorial on how to use this wonderful tool.

Last Updated on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 09:05
 

Google's YouTube and Automatic Transcription

E-mail Print PDF

Is the future here?

I will be the first one to admit that I've been slow to jump on the accessibility bandwagon.  I haven't seen much of a need for the extra work.  Recently, there have been a series of technologies that have made accessibility less of a chore.  The latest of these technologies is GOOGLE'S transcription software that uses a voice recognition algorithm to create an automatic transcription feed on the screen.

This is an incredible breakthrough!  One that has been a long time coming.  With this functionality, business and education institutions alike will benefit.  The cost to have anything transcribed isn't cheap.  Organizations in need of this service either outsource it to a company or individual that specializes in this type of work, or they pay an employee with the skills to transcribe each finished production.  I'm not going to go so far as to say that this technology will replace the humans that do this work, but it does a pretty good job for those on a tight budget!

I like the fact that the automatic transcription is something that can be selected and set by the end-user.  There isn't any work that the publisher of a file needs to do.  The end-user simply hovers over the Closed Captioning button in the control interface and waits for a fly-out menu to appear.  The viewer can then select to transcribe the audio.  The other feature I like about this is that the viewer can choose to change the font, font size, and the background color of the transcription text.  If you have a YouTube account, you can save these settings so that all future transcriptions use these same preferences.  Quite a few controls.

Sounds great, right?  It really is.  I'm very impressed with it.  However, this technology is still in its infancy.  There are kinks.  The biggest of these is the ability for the speech recognition software to recognize all words accurately.  The algorithm may get a few lines perfect only to render the next few lines with sentences that make no sense.  It generates real words, but the words it thinks are being said make very little sense in a full sentence.  Occasionally, these interpretations can generate some rather hilarious sentences.  For some reason, the algorithm likes to pair members of the Republican and Democratic parties together!  These are by far, the funniest.  Just like our lawmakers in Washington, the tool isn't perfect!

Last Updated on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:48
 



Related Articles